Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilson, Carmen
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-06T23:18:45Z
dc.date.available2018-12-06T23:18:45Z
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11803/767
dc.description.abstractThe war on drugs is, arguably, a failed social policy, and yet it persists. This thesis uses scholarly review and analysis to ask: What is the social and individual psychology that accounts for the endurance of a demonstratively failed drug policy? From there, this inquiry goes on to ask what is the social and individual psychology that informs change in appropriate drug policy? This study finds that there is a relationship between addiction and dislocation due to stigma, and that one of the main driving forces behind the continuation of drug prohibition is cognitive dissonance. Two empirically validated treatments for addiction are reviewed. Family therapy is connected to the theory of dislocation, and motivational interviewing is connected to dissonance theory.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectDrug policyen_US
dc.subjectAddictionen_US
dc.subjectSocial psychologyen_US
dc.subjectDecriminalizationen_US
dc.subjectDrug prohibitionen_US
dc.subjectWar on drugsen_US
dc.subjectCognitive dissonanceen_US
dc.subjectDislocation theoryen_US
dc.titleSocial Psychology of Drug Policy: Dislocation and Dissonance Theoryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineCounselingen_US
thesis.degree.grantorCity University of Seattleen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Counsellingen_US
cityu.schoolDivision of Arts and Sciencesen_US
cityu.siteVancouver, BCen_US
cityu.site.countryCanadaen_US


Files in this item

PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States