Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLinder, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-27T01:21:17Z
dc.date.available2021-03-27T01:21:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-21
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11803/1030
dc.description.abstractThis study presents an analysis of the language and actions surrounding a jury trial in Alberta in 2015. The findings include many examples of prejudicial or in some cases what may be considered inappropriate or ethically compromised actions or words. I wish to state for the record that I do not believe any of the members of the Crown or Defense teams, nor the Court were in any way motivated by conscious bias, racist beliefs or any improper intent. For the most part their words and actions reflected the mainstream discourse as it is commonly used. I may question their judgement in some instances but not their intentions to do anything other than honourably discharge their obligations.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectPrejudicial Languageen_US
dc.titleThe Dehumanization of Cindy Gladueen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineCounselingen_US
thesis.degree.grantorCity University of Seattleen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Counsellingen_US
cityu.schoolSchool of Health and Social Sciencesen_US
cityu.siteVictoriaen_US
cityu.site.countryCanadaen_US


Files in this item

PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States